Vocabulary is essential to every subject in education. It is
essential that students learn vocabulary in order to make connections and learn
about more complicated concepts. Vocabulary is the crucial first step required
for learning and deep understanding. If students do not understand the
vocabulary they can often make misconceptions about whole concepts. The list
group label vocabulary strategy seems like it would be useful to introduce a
concept or new vocabulary to a students. Someone lists all the words they can
think are related to the concept, and then group the words into groups that
have something in common. At the end of the activity, students come up with a label
for each group. I like how students categorize words into groups so they can make
associations between vocabulary words they believe have commonalities. However,
I foresee some problems some of my students might make during this activity.
Therefore, the teacher needs to go over the vocabulary words so students do not
develop misconceptions amongst the vocabulary words.
Overall, I found Allen’s chapter 3 quite enjoyable. I loved
all of the concept maps they used and I found myself thinking on which ones I
could use effectively in the unit I am currently teaching in Biology. There are
a lot of wonderful concept maps/ graphic organizers and Allen provides enough
on each one for readers to figure out by themselves how it is used and when it
should be used in a classroom, without specifically telling when to do so.
However, I would have liked to hear more on each one. While there is just enough
information to provide the reader a basic understanding of the concept maps and
the activities around them I would have liked more information as most of the
specific strategies outlined in the chapter are discussed in a small paragraph.
I think he was vague on purpose. Look at how different our content areas are. If he gave more indepth analysis of the strategies then they would appear less flexible. For example, you highlighted the list group label method for science, and I did too for language. I agree that sometimes we need more information about practical application but not so much that it makes it context specific.
ReplyDelete